The UN Nuclear Watchdog Reaches a Temporary Inspection Plan With Iran

by Stephanie Liechtenstein. Read more on PassBlue.

Rafael Mariano Grossi, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, briefing the media at Vienna International Airport, after he traveled to Tehran over the weekend and reached a temporary deal for the agency to continue nuclear inspections in the country, Feb. 21, 2021. DEAN CALMA/IAEA

VIENNA — Iran has told the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations nuclear watchdog, that it will significantly limit inspections of its nuclear facilities as of Feb. 23.

Rafael Mariano Grossi, the director-general of the Vienna-based agency, traveled to Tehran over the weekend to meet with Iranian officials to try to preserve at least some level of monitoring and verification for the UN entity.

Speaking to reporters on Sunday evening, Feb. 21, upon returning from Iran, Grossi said: “There is less access, let’s face it. But still, we were able to retain the necessary degree of monitoring and verification work.”

Grossi announced that the IAEA and Iran reached a “temporary, bilateral and technical understanding whereby the agency is going to continue its necessary verification and monitoring activities for a period of up to three months.” This plan will remain “under constant review” and could be suspended early or extended at any time.

“We want to avoid a situation where we are essentially flying blind,” Grossi added. He said the temporary agreement would enable IAEA inspectors to do their work “in a satisfactory manner.”

The arrangement also provides a bit of space for the United States and Iran to find a diplomatic path to return to mutual compliance and save the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. The US, under the Trump administration, walked away from it in 2018.

Apart from the new agreement, Iran is still obliged to adhere to the so-called Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, or NPT. Under the Safeguards Agreement, Iran is bound to allow IAEA inspectors access to sites in Iran where nuclear materials are being produced and stored.

In a confidential report to the IAEA’s member states, seen by PassBlue, Grossi specified last week the various restrictions Tehran will introduce.

They relate, first and foremost, to the suspension of the Additional Protocol, which Iran committed to under the Iran deal. It grants the IAEA short-notice inspections of facilities that are not declared by Iran as nuclear sites. It is designed to help the agency determine that there are no undeclared nuclear materials or activities in Iran.

But Iran’s intentions go beyond suspending the Additional Protocol.

According to the confidential report, Iran also wants to prevent IAEA inspectors from using “modern technologies.” In the last few years, the agency has made considerable use of remote, continuous monitoring and surveillance technology, such as electronic seals, cameras, radiation detectors and online enrichment monitors.

On this point, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif was clear. “The IAEA certainly will not get footage from those cameras,” he told the government-run, English-language Press TV on Feb. 21.

Furthermore, Iran intends to stop implementing other transparency measures related to “enrichment,” “uranium ore concentrate” and “centrifuge component manufacturing.” It also intends to restrict “access pursuant to provisions of the JCPOA,” which could mean restricting daily access to its main enrichment plants in Natanz and Fordow.

“Any loss of access is concerning, but this agreement between Iran and the IAEA staves off a crisis in the short term and should allow inspectors to reconstruct the history of Iran’s nuclear activities if the nuclear deal is restored,” Kelsey Davenport, director of the nonproliferation policy at the Washington-based Arms Control Association, told PassBlue. “This record will help counter speculation that Iran engaged in illicit nuclear activities when access was reduced.”

In addition to restricting IAEA access as of Feb. 23, Tehran has significantly stepped up its breaches of the Iran deal in recent months. It has begun enriching uranium to 20 percent, initiated the production of uranium metal and installed cascades of advanced centrifuges at its underground uranium enrichment plant in Natanz, which is built inside a mountain to resist potential bombardment. Under the nuclear deal, Iran is allowed to enrich uranium only up to 3.67 percent purity with less-efficient centrifuges. It also agreed not to produce uranium metal for 15 years.

Grossi, the head of the IAEA, center left, meeting in Tehran with Javad Zarif, minister of foreign affairs, center right, and others. Feb. 21, 2021. Grossi said that Iran agreed to a “temporary, bilateral and technical understanding whereby the agency is going to continue its necessary verification and monitoring activities for a period of up to three months.”

Meanwhile, the remaining participants to the accord have increased diplomatic efforts to use the small window of time that remains to save the deal. The foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany (E3) met in Paris on Feb. 18, with the US joining virtually; in a joint statement from the four countries, they warned Iran “not to take any additional steps,” particularly related to limiting IAEA access. (China and Russia, also parties to the nuclear deal, have encouraged the US and Iran to return to compliance with the pact.)

The statement from the E3 and the US added that they were united in “underlining the dangerous nature of a decision to limit IAEA access” and urged Iran to “consider the consequences of such grave action, particularly at this time of renewed diplomatic opportunity.”

President Joe Biden told a virtual meeting of the Munich Security Conference on Feb. 19 that the US would work closely with allies in dealing with the Iranian nuclear issue. “The threat of nuclear proliferation also continues to require careful diplomacy and cooperation among us,” Biden said.

The challenge for rescuing the nuclear deal for the E3 and the US is sequencing the next steps. Iran says that the US must lift sanctions first, while the US insists that Iran must return to compliance with the deal before the US removes sanctions.

To break the deadlock, Enrique Mora, the deputy secretary general of the European External Action Service, the diplomatic service and foreign and defense ministry of the European Union, tweeted last week that he was prepared to invite all parties to a meeting. The US said it was willing to join, and while the offer for talks was not outright rejected, there is no response from Tehran yet.

As a US State Department official said on Feb. 18 about the overall challenges: “The only way this is going to happen — if it’s going to happen — I assume this is going to be a painstaking and difficult process that’s going to take some time for it to see whether both sides agree on what they will define as compliance or compliance.”

So far, however, the actions of the US can be interpreted as a sign of good will but has not provided sanctions relief to Iran. Last week, the Biden administration reversed the “snapback” provision in the UN resolution endorsing the Iran nuclear deal, after the Trump administration invoked it last September, with no support from other Security Council members. The move by the US in the Council last fall claimed that all UN sanctions should be reimposed on Iran, but it was arguably a moot assertion.

Washington has also lifted restrictions on Iranian diplomats’ movements in New York City — possibly enabling an informal meeting of the parties to gather there soon, at the political directors’ level, although Geneva, Paris and Vienna are also rumored as settings for informal talks to be held.

Davenport of the Arms Control Association said: “It is imperative for Biden to act quickly before the window for restoring the nuclear deal closes. Failure to do so increases the risk of conflict and destabilizing nuclear competition in the region.”

--

--

--

Independent Coverage the United Nations. A project of The New School’s Studley Graduate Program in International Affairs, supported by the Carnegie Corporation.

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

What would a Conservative leadership election look like?

Пандемия! Крах!

Thursday 26th March 2020

Qatarisation: Qataris to fill 60 percent of workforce in state-owned private sector companies

Business “first” model for hospitality sector not fit for purpose

The EU, Tech Trustbusting, and Trade Wars

The EU flag superimposed over a Matrix “code waterfall” effect; in the center of the ring of stars is a vintage newspaper caricature of Roosevelt as a trustbuster, swinging his “big stick.”

I Just Have a Lot of Feelings About Asean, Okay??

Lisa Nandy – the leader Labour need

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
PassBlue

PassBlue

Independent Coverage the United Nations. A project of The New School’s Studley Graduate Program in International Affairs, supported by the Carnegie Corporation.

More from Medium

People Make the World Go Round - Evergreen Music and Mentality - in conversation with Corwin Harper

Opinion: Conservative politics could play into school elections

Survival of the European Union — Reform Away From ‘One-Size Fits All’ Policy

Why is the price of Ethereum gasoline so high?